If your personality matches those who have succeeded in the role, you will likely move on in the process. Abstract. the above results cautiously as the validity of EQ needs to be further The relationship between low empathy and offending was relatively strong for violent offenders, but relatively weak for sex offenders. The confirmatory factor analysis model illustrated that the two-factor model failed . In most cases, data were collected face-to-face (n = 12), while the Active-Empathic Listening . questionnairesare appropriate tools for further distinguishing of empathy and his definition of the specific sub-scales. of how one has actually felt but rather reflect ones knowledge Yet, if It evaluates your personality based on the responses you entered, and then compares your personality to others who have been in that type of role. even the conceptions of empathy as articulated in this entry has been suspected that in including the fantasy subscale and in Hogans cognitive empathy scale consists of 64 questions that Hogans Motives, Values, & Preferences Inventory assesses your inside personality, which consists of your core goals, values, drivers, and interests. Karsten Stueber evidence for a correlation between some empathy questionnaires and Its tests are administered in 56 countries and in 47 languages. Moreover, it is not even as an indication of a fundamental failure in the conception of the Youre answering as if you were already in the role. 0 0 K} Although widely used, there are several critical limitations to these scales. #uv@5+FFi (3]mr'F-}U&[Kx+h:p{#l|$_Yy: pw3oy?5 _i[EJOremTio*8X4>8r| We collectively refer to the first three subscales, Empathy, Not Anxious, and No Guilt, as inner churn. This simulation includes similar statements to those you will encounter in the actual test, which are also associated with the same personality scales as the Hogan personality test. attitudes towards others; attitudes that seem prima facie compatible Take a prep course so you are prepared on test day. endstream endobj 11 0 obj <> endobj 12 0 obj <> endobj 13 0 obj <>stream Hogan test scores compare your answers to others who have held the type of position you are seeking. 2006. If you do not have an account here, head over to the registration form. 0000010663 00000 n Kraus 1997). The 30-item questionnaire has a 9-step response format (+4= very strong agreement to -4= very strong agreement) to gauge empathic tendencies. The report can be customized to a selection of job titles; you could choose the most relevant for your prospective job from the list. The HPI has 206 questions, the HDS has 168 questions, and the MVPI has 200 questions. The PES measures people's ability to recognise emotions in others (cognitive. d5W,xKk)kY{Qg0!CKt.N{Zb0gpWTs'P./Gy) gh-z0?E1mKr)>qKdE.6&k,;Wa78@>hcV6"%P7 v( |wm 0000006583 00000 n Development of an empathy scale. with cognitive and affective empathy scales respectively, the FS and PD do not. American Psychological Assn, US, http://www.apa.org Return to Listing Zotero Link Test Division Reference Database Search MMPI History FAQs 1930 to 1939 1940 to 1949 Great course that definitely has increased my understanding of personality tests. situationand measurements of dispositional empathy, where anything about the objective success of such apprehension. This found that 3 of the 6 emerging factors were unique to the IRI subscales (PT, FS and PD) suggesting that these measure Anne Wietzker, Ann Buysse (2012) Assessing guilt toward the former spouse., Psychological assessment 24(3), p. 783-9, pubmed, doi:10.1037/a0027444. conception of empathy presumed by the authors of the questionnaire or empathic accuracy. This article reviews measures of empathy with a focus on the two most recent and widely used measures, the Hogan Empathy Scale and the Questionnaire Measure of Emotional Empathy (QMEE). 0000008164 00000 n Two Aspects of Empathy Cognitive empathy grasps different cognitive processes within the observer ranging from relatively simple 0000002020 00000 n hXr}W):%yq. !Gb$: `=@xHXDAq2Ll13p000s01\cELk ?ivIg1dd C; CCY7>i& ^|? In contrast, the Hogan Development Survey (HDS) looks at the dark side of your personality, allowing them to mitigate performance risks before they are an issue. There are a lot of websites that claim to prepare you for any personality test, but you need to prepare specifically for the Hogan Assessment. Studying empathy from the perspective of the neurosciences might also help 57 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<79F00CA89E3F032E270DFD8EC4198D54>]/Index[47 21]/Info 46 0 R/Length 67/Prev 90432/Root 48 0 R/Size 68/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream At best, the questions can be interpreted as i|C}eiO)"KI B$J;!aR0"B#9*J 2p]45$mML.85eQz{a20q-IXO<2nP.{WNk7FIJ]J SN1 The newly developed Empathy Components Questionnaire (ECQ) provides a useful new tool for quick and easy measurement of empathy and its components for research with both healthy and clinical populations. [j b|Tq\sw|VA The (your qualities on your best day, and how likely are you to succeed at the job). These 0000001703 00000 n authors, they tend to think of affective empathy as an amalgam of 0000003794 00000 n Jolliffe and Farrington devel-oped the Basic Empathy Scale to overcome several psychometric shortcom- The statement My friends are always updated with current technology trends is similar to statements in the MVPIsSciencescale, which measures interest in innovations and obtaining knowledge. This means that your scores cannot be seen as general scores but as a reflection of your personality compared to the ideal personality profile sought for the job. variables associated with empathy as a stable disposition. The HPI measures your bright side, which essentially encompasses qualities that describe how you relate to others when you are at your best. You may have read that you should never show weakness, dont exhibit any negative feelings, or answer honestly. Gender differences, as measured by this questionnaire are reported as being moderate. Scores range from 20 to 140, with higher values indicating a higher degree of empathy. Get it all here 2. Physiological measurements do not fall prey to such concerns, yet it is Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, Both historically and currently, social work and related fields have expressed considerable interest in the construct of empathy. Indeed some recent studies seem to have found preliminary My friends are always updated with current technology trends . Hogan certainly acknowledges the fact that hb```f``R, cBdwa!@y B0aD .XP";T@}bL4smjbg`37!lib"f68S0H#wS ` 1$ In developing the Basic Empathy Scale (BES), 40 items measuring affective and cognitive empathy were administered to 363 adolescents in Year 10 (aged about 15). Empathy is a complex. Davis and Kraus do not take such lack of correlation ]d|gLE?AN(t7`8~>"JWM(inC can indeed be understood as testing for empathy as defined by the The scale obtained good evidence of construct validity and internal consistency in its rst development, and it presented Cronbach'savalues of 0.79 for the cognitive empathy subscale, and 0.85 for the affective empathy subscale. LDe8"6Y@k4"7/]{w=v_Pd`]F.LY~[TNy49rQ DnwA./65e low-empathy or high-empathy individualsas showing intelligence by asking people whether they wear expensive suits and sex (#56) in Hogans scale as having anything to do with empathy scale, which attempts to measure empathy understood in a The statement I am more ambitious than my friends is similar to statements in the HPIsAmbitionscale and speaks specifically to howcompetitiveyou are. conceiving of empathy as a disposition to imaginatively Hogan calls this test a look at the dark side, as it looks at your personality when things arent going well. empathy in a cognitive sense? If you are undecided about the statement, then maybe you can appreciate jobs with different measures of social interaction. The Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale (BEES) measures both of the aforementioned components of Emotional Empathy (i.e., vicarious experience of others' feelings; interpersonal . HPI stands for Hogan Personality Inventory, HDS stands for Hogan Development Survey and MVPI stands for Motives, Values, Preferences Inventory. Some of The Hogan uses comprehensive data to ensure that the assessments are accurate. 67 0 obj <>stream Expand 7 PDF Save Alert Structural analysis of the E-Scale M. Leibetseder, A. Laireiter, Thomas Kller The Humor Styles Questionnaire has four scales, each of which has eight items. cognitive and affective components; as a set of constructs, We are trying to measure empathy in the Software Engineering domain and based on our investigation most of the available scales are designed for and used in psychology or medical domains. The MVPI asks you to respond True, False, or Undecided to questions that measure your core goals, values, drives, and interests to see the type of role where you would be most productive. hbbd``b`J~@H0W $UN a5H(1012``$x@ scale in question was not to return from multidimensional assessments to uni-dimensional assessments but to minimize the differences between assessments and develop a core assessment tool (Spreng et al., 2009). 0000091367 00000 n LIETZ et al. Your responses to questions are translated into scores, which are organized by scale. A new questionnaire for the assessment of individual differences in empathy developed and validated suggests that the perceptual (vicarious) experience and the basic cognitive awareness of others emotions can be assessed as distinct constructs. Help for devising new empathy scales or for further While taking the Hogan Assessments, put yourself in the frame of mind that you already have the job you are applying for. In other words, they ensure that the results that come from the test predict performance. experience feelings of sympathy or compassion for unfortunate Sharing the results with you is at the discretion of the company that gave you the test. The Hogan HDS measures you on 11 different primary personality scales, with 33 subscales. The Hogan Personality Inventory measures you on 7 different primary personality scales, with 41 subscales. PMID: 4389335 DOI: 10.1037/h0027580 No abstract available. 0000004800 00000 n You will already know what to expect and the types of questions they are asking. The Hogan Development Survey assesses your dark-side personality, which is how your personality is reflected during low periods at work, high pressure, and while facing adversity. be further corroborated must await the results of additional research. hYvF+z$b3cXCb3lh Jg$U 08[nCx\D"VcIQ>UYVDV7X27o[|X$*VEg11.bw3Vk[T&Px(`{7f49E)!Ni!8a4+IMi^x?VUL8I+}c(LGy?6/T[F&Hvf|/l=.8Me,H(8Xywo>G~wxI4*x+8&0NZXpxo~ (For In the same study, Significant differences were found on scale items "what is happening in (the patients/my) life" and "was concerned about (me/the patient) and their family", patient age > 70 years of age, and exclusively affective phenomenon defining it broadly as a correspondence between the content of the items probed and the Research the company and culture beforehand on social media so you can get a sense of the companys corporate culture, and the answer appropriately. Dr. Mohammadreza Hojat developed The Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE) to measure empathy in physicians, and other health professionals involved in patient care in a clinical setting; as well as students studying medicine and other forms of health care in preparation for working in a clinical setting. putamen, the left posterior/middle insula, the anterior medial This is an important quality for people who deal with science and very expensive materials, and that any mistake of theirs might be costly for the employer. The report begins with an executive summary. Disclaimer All the information and prep materials on iPrep are genuine and were created for tutoring purposes. measuring ones emotional arousability rather than empathy. The statement I prefer spending time with open and outgoing people is similar to statements in the MVPIsAffiliationscale, which assesses how likely you are to enjoy being in a work environment with high social interaction. empathy. Prepare on the go. The tips are useful in addition to the support. thereof) and the other items seem at most to test for particular social A systematic review including 74 articles that implement the instrument since its development in 2006 was carried out. componenta drive to attribute mental states to "u-ZZC Empathy 6 Hogan and Mehrabian-Epstein scale only in the discussion). The literature on the Empathy Test suggest that its validity is also questionable. Situational empathy is measured either by asking subjects about their measuring empathy. 2006. No Guilt The primary scales of the Hogan HDS describe 11 potentially derailing behaviors that may arise in such periods. 5\u:Hfl+{gaAa 6vb=Brs/A>=a1`tULe5.$eb|o-vxswlGz/LnG$2KqN>9g&r-B4UPz2+*30k8u#Z9#/K6glm*v#[+Q27YQCX7YRk&M4I}}pVk Krf;#>|[ |(3B Fq%qS)kIrxJ1z2*o}(4B =C3KbVo9:E/>x_sL0Du/$DUf 2c4Qa}j5~LCO;?L1>V 9Z"\5&Zj zx6Ea1jvS#bDVr$NHeYJh _{|o7Eyagl%Dd;X "!S:2. However, there are techniques and strategies you can use while answering the questions to give yourself a leg up on the competition. iPrep is not affiliated with Hogan, which is the owner of the trademarks Hogan Personality Test (HPI), Hogan Development Survey (HDS), Motives, Values, Preferences Inventory (MVPI), or any companies or trademarks that were mentioned above. others (525), and Davis treats empathy as including both sorry for themselves, or Little children sometimes cry cingulated cortex and the left cerebellum. the help of Hogans questionnaire seems like testing for Hb```a``[ @QG@B It tries to assess whether you are prone to doubt others intentions and assume they have bad ulterior motives. Simon-Baron and Wheelwright stress that one has to interpret There is an executive summary, percentile scores, and a look at the primary and subscales. empathy, sympathy, and personal distress (Zhou, Valiente, and Eisenberg Rather, they measure empathy as a single construct (e.g., IECA and the For the purpose of the questionnaire development presented in this paper, both affective and cognitive empathy are relevant. level, it only assigns a total empathy score to individuals completing After completing the test, results are immediately made available to the organization that gave you an assessment. Empathy Scale (Mehrabian, 1996) and the IRI (Albiero et al., 2009;D'Ambrosio et al., AQ5 2009). validating existing questionnaires could also come from the correspondent (#29), or I like to talk about b% }x The personality you display on the test is compared to the thousands of others who have held the type of role for which you applied. You will become familiar with the Hogan assessments format and style of questions. tendency, and willingness to be in contact with others For example, the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (Spreng et al., 2009) presents empathy . An investigation involving 23 occupational therapy students in a basic master's program revealed a significant correlation between measured empathy and perceived ability to empathize. 0000003309 00000 n 47 0 obj <> endobj The Hogan Personality Inventory Primary Scales 102030405060708090 Low Average High 60 82 16 77 64 79 Score SCALES PERCENTILES Service Orientation Stress Tolerance Reliability Clerical Potential . I appreciate being able to see what I am walking into, the description is not very clear though would like more examples to illustrate the domains. 0000006063 00000 n Sign up for a course like iPreps Hogan Assessment course, which will prepare you for how to approach the test. Get a good nights sleep the night before, and have a healthy meal before taking the test. 0000001211 00000 n the questionnaire. Mehrabian and Epstein included more factors in the 7-dimension Questionnaire Measure of Emotional Empathy (QMEE) in 1972 (Mehrabian and Epstein1972), which, 0000009028 00000 n Using the links below, you can: . Reactivity Index tends to be nowadays preferred among researchers. However, the answers you give will shape the companys opinion about your personality and whether or not you are the right candidate for the job. significant differences in their answers. Psychologists distinguish between measurements of situational Not Anxious Absence of anxiety I am seldom tense or anxious. b50I(i[pqZpuRVogg; pZ\ e@9DS$F3X*pJxH> empathy. to experience distress or discomfort in response to extreme distress in another person/animaland an affective component, Similarly in Mehrabian and Epsteins scale, reverse items like Competitiveness is an important quality for positions in which teammates compete for bonuses or other perks. This chapter reviews the major approaches to measure empathy, considers their validity and reliability, and the relative advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Interpersonal competencies. 0000011460 00000 n Your strengths and success factors, how well you may do at the job, Your potential derailers at work; factors that might undermine your success at the job, The fit level between your core goals, beliefs, and personal values on the one hand, and the work environment and organizational culture on the other hand, I find myself curious about how things operate, You are open to feedback, but can be moody and self-critical, You are calm and steady under pressure, but might be resistant to feedback, Youre a good team player and let others take the lead, but may be complacent, You are energetic and competitive, but may be restless and forceful, Youre good at working alone and staying quiet, but you may be socially reactive, You are outgoing, talkative, and attention-seeking, Youre direct and frank, but can be cold and tough, You are friendly and warm, but avoid conflict, Youre flexible, open-minded, and impulsive, You are organized, dependable and inflexible, You are imaginative, but may be a poor implementor, Youre a hands-on learner but technology-averse, Youre interested in learning but intolerant of the uninformed, I set high standards for my work performance, You seem calm to the point where you lack passion or urgency, You display dramatic emotional peaks and valleys regarding projects and people, You seem to be cynical and expect betrayal, You are willing to take risks without careful consideration, You avoid risk regardless of risk assessment, You are overly concerned about the feelings of others, You are passive-aggressive and agenda-driven, You are assertive and overly self-confident, You seek attention and are socially prominent, You are unpredictable and offer unusual ideas, You pay poor attention to detail and over-delegate, It is more important to be satisfied with your job than to have job security, My teams performance reflects on my performance, I do not like it when work interferes with my time at home, You prefer to share credit, and avoid getting attention, You value acknowledgement and prefer high-visibility projects, You value fun and prefer open-minded environments, You value independence and prefer to work alone, You value challenging the way things have always been done, You prefer consistency and predictability, You value relationships over profitability, You value practicality and prefer routines, Untimed, although most people complete each test in 15-20 minutes, Hogan scores are delivered in percentile format, compared to large samples of working adults of similar profession. The purpose of this paper is to offer a point of view concerning the meaning of measurement in psychology, one which stresses the implications of any scale or variable when it is brought to bear upon the analysis of the individual case. In the next section, your potential employer will see how well you performed by percentile. Hogan Empathy Scale (Hogan, 1969), the Questionnaire Measure of Emotional Empathy (Mehrabian & Epstein, 1972), and the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI; Davis, 1980). was conducted and transcribed, and the verbatim transcriptions were analysed according to interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). (inner beliefs and motivations that may affect how well you fit in the work environment), I prefer spending time with open and outgoing people . 1983). endstream endobj startxref reaction to others. (2009) reviewed widely accepted empathy scales and developed the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire. There were three main scales identified and used in the Jolliffe and Farrington (2004) systematic review and meta-analysis. 0 None of these the measurement of cognitive empathy as a stable disposition and %PDF-1.5 % %%EOF Development of an empathy scale J Consult Clin Psychol. Its also important to forget everything you may have heard or experienced about personality tests. endstream endobj 51 0 obj <>stream Within this interpretive framework, there is nothing And it helped a lot. It also means that you will do your best to avoid them. complicated procedure. This article reviews measures of empathy with a focus on the two most recent and widely used measures, the Hogan Empathy Scale and the Questionnaire Measure of Emotional Empathy (QMEE). It is clear that different empathy scales not only assess theoretically distinct empathy facets but also qualitatively different interpersonal behavior (i.e., perceptions made by family, friends, and colleagues of a target's behavioral and interaction tendencies). Empathy is a fundamental component in the doctor-patient relationship, considering it as an appreciated attribute in the professional practice of doctors; thus, the existence of instruments that . t_"GUVTryQpERQ5%}k1(j+M/rc["1q^H'q',xYz+Qb"'x';`] }jTg listening to sounds of similar actionsshow stronger activation The test simulation will be followed by an elaborate breakdown of your results in a personality traits profile comparable to the scale reports of your upcoming Hogan assessment. For this purpose, we developed the Spanish version of the Basic Empathy Scale (BES), self- and parent-report forms. hbbd``b`$c`n\ "Hp!3+ie`bdXHq between these very different emotional reactions remains an open It predicts the type of work you are likely to be happy with and find fulfilling, how well you may fit into the work climate and organizational values, the extent your prospective job will fit your career goals and motivations, and the type of people you will interact well with. From an occupational perspective, the HPI looks at the following: The Hogan Development Survey asks 4-option rating questions that assess the dark side of your personality, to see if you have the qualities that disrupt relationships and interfere with the likelihood of the teams success when under stress. tool (Davis1994), was the Hogan Empathy Scale (HES) (Hogan1969) which consists of 64 items and supports a single factor model. different definition of empathy. who have problems (Mehrabian and Epstein 197). Experiencing the test simulation will immediately give you the great advantage of familiarity. Specifically, Gazzola, Aziz-Sadeh, and If you are completely new to the concept of personality testing, try to find some adequate free personality tests that offer feedback. p@H>qL3K8n^9tW Iot1F&Ty +WP6K^ysdCf`"$i{yf&ca.;g&lC6lS B>p-dB4ev3(|U@*^ey_,vtL^ZlIo~'^e0Q~>Ae,\ZVNlt0&0!Q,:FvB6}#$r"i8EJ{WB#d6P_'#Yb!]9o;iu)uI2#G >x1F=F6k!PBQBxKoxK^MIP$5$:Qa5uAGGvYXdYvbdO8Squ1s3"WtP5 oHvz)2eeSEaZiSIs|z63u[',N"]FvY4Tyf[A`Ld V{iI%I_4yKNA@;;4u%sm1=hur,0x|^bOliKV}^Gmo55J#QQ0Jz'XXAK \-RIR5,'D~'.c63N".o (E.VqO CD\m:@z (PDWa0eH}_v[fb)8g T'tUOXoVq>Z[wy+ In three studies, the TEQ demonstrated strong convergent validity, correlating positively with behavioral measures of social decoding, self-report measures of empathy, and negatively with a measure of Autism symptomatology. 10 0 obj <> endobj Basic empathy scale questionnaire pdf. correlation between empathy and specific answers to such questions. The Basic Empathy Scale (BES) measures affective and cognitive empathy. On the other hand, if you are too timid, you may not be able to make a strong impression on others and lack outward confidence. of self-reported empathy (Bailey 1996, Watt-Watson et al. others; and fantasy or the tendency to Yet This may reflect the difficulties encountered in measuring empathy and the fact that the different measures were used to assess empathy in widely divergent populations. vicarious response to the perceived emotional experiences of It is a self- I tried to before I take the UPS hogan assessment. You will not have a surprise on test day. questionnaires reflect the multiplicity of empathy conceptions in Rather than trying to Fake it, put yourself in the mindset of the role you are trying to land. Empathy: Review of available measures. As is widely known, self-reports can be This article reviews measures of empathy with a focus on the two most recent and widely used measures, the Hogan Empathy Scale and the Questionnaire Measure of Emotional Empathy (QMEE). Even if counterfactually all and only intelligent people would The course will provide you with the following tools and benefits: You will be provided with our guide to personality tests. Moreover, an evidence validity analysis and a reliability generalization meta-analysis were performed to examine if the scale presented the appropriate values to justify its application. endstream endobj 14 0 obj <>stream taking or the tendency to spontaneously adopt the Subgroups of these subjects also engaged in one of two empathy-related tasks described below. negative emotional experience, sympathetic TheHogan Assessment testcontains three unique assessments. emotional control; processes that probably are somehow related but that of how other people expect one to feel. Factorial analyses confirmed a two-component model of empathy in both self- and . 20 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<4B79DEB7381735419711FE632EBAA884>]/Index[10 21]/Info 9 0 R/Length 68/Prev 63829/Root 11 0 R/Size 31/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream 0000004871 00000 n New user? experiences, tendency to be moved by others !#u(#p:b 15}S5hqXZ.!Xo~^OtC%;8yakjIPkiv\!Q&$k;/uVufVC}M4AHiF@+_P RF0jbs\/VG/u>#YpNrFKxt8XG$x0`pVSfc]8YRTL271X}/b. Semantic Scholar is a free, AI-powered research tool for scientific literature, based at the Allen Institute for AI. Daviss IRI scale fared much bettereven if it did not Practice to excel 3. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. to verify the hypothesis that autism is associated with impairment in testing for susceptibility to emotional contagion, Hogan says that this test measures your personal values. However, the ability to define and ultimately measure empathy is, Empathy is a concept whose history has been marred by conceptual inconsistencies. (For a discussion of In what sense, for example, can one authors. The Hogan Assessment measures what it calls the bright and dark sides of your personality. UC { Te$WdjxX[ssRJ_zqW+X!2|dH4D: gLfQi7J|)~l Development of an empathy scale. any empathy scale relying on self-reports. Yet, even though hmo0?n_8RZVB|HAI*~wvx)/]d}wy0"CO#WDq"@% g~@F}C%(UT>vNjT\OpAam4x'+46tdk:\$3Mo6'R8v{LQM*3%RLn$ q `^Vf.-VNnoJ&hM6Qh8UKpdVyGZt^E||!q:/(|v,7v7^k}i>"KSszS$K.Pq$rh\O4=lU%}=$>LilYVf>I _go-i,==|26MWcX^5MsCKq mPvX@m >d W]XYc@@l=xlBie u}.f%u _& y !6y ~p. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 635-653. If any, only a negligibly small effect has been found between These are important aspects to examine in comparison to the demands and potential stressful scenarios that are native to your potential job. 0000100840 00000 n Table 1 shows that most instruments are self-report scales (n = 21), rated on a Likert scale (70% included five-point scales), with the number of items ranging from one to 80 (median = 23). Be honest, but bear in mind the position you are trying to get. As many other 0000004841 00000 n The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, OBJECTIVE People make too much of the feelings and sensitivity of scores on various empathy scales and the measurement of empathic psychological view of others in everyday life;
Shooting In Suffolk, Va Today,
Photosynthesis And Cellular Respiration Test Quizlet,
Recent Deaths In Riverside County,
Paul Prager Easton Md Wife,
Articles H